No hobbit for you!

From politics to poetry, if it isn't covered in one of the other forums and you want to share it with us, put it here.

No hobbit for you!

Postby warmongerclub » Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:56 pm

Jackson says he won't be making `Hobbit'

WELLINGTON, New Zealand - Peter Jackson says he will not be directing a movie based on J.R.R. Tolkien's novel "The Hobbit" or a planned prequel to "The Lord of the Rings."

In a letter posted on Theonering.com., Jackson and partner Fran Walsh said an executive from New Line Cinema had called to tell them the studio was moving ahead with "The Hobbit" without him.

"Last week, Mark Ordesky called Ken (Kamins, Jackson's manager) and told him that New Line would no longer be requiring our services on `The Hobbit' and the LOTR `prequel,'" the 45-year-old New Zealand director wrote.

"This was a courtesy call to let us know that the studio was now actively looking to hire another filmmaker for both projects," he said.

Robert Pini, a New York-based representative for New Line Cinema, said Tuesday the studio had no comment.

New Line Cinema holds the rights to produce "The Hobbit" and Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer has the rights to distribute it.

Jackson, who shepherded Tolkien's Middle-earth saga to the screen in a series of three films, won a best-director Oscar for 2003's "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King." The trilogy also includes 2002's "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" and 2001's "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring."

A spokesman for Wingnut Films, Jackson's production company in Wellington, who spoke on his standard condition that he not be named, confirmed Tuesday the letter was genuine.

The announcement came amid an ongoing dispute between Wingnut Films and New Line Cinema over the amount Jackson was paid for "The Fellowship of the Ring," including DVD payments.

While Jackson hasn't said how much he believes he was underpaid, The New York Times last year quoted his lawyers as saying it was as much as $100 million. He is suing New Line Cinema over the shortfall.

The Dominion Post newspaper quoted Jackson as saying that because he and Walsh didn't want to discuss upcoming movies "until the lawsuit is resolved, the studio is going to have to hire another director."

"We are very sorry our involvement with `The Hobbit' has ended this way," the pair added.

Plans for Jackson to make a $128 million movie version of the sci-fi video game "Halo" were also scrapped this month after backers 20th Century Fox and Universal Pictures pulled out.

Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy grossed nearly $3 billion at box offices worldwide.
warmongerclub
 
Posts: 2037
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:24 am

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby Jeramakus » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:13 am

Quote:
The announcement came amid an ongoing dispute between Wingnut Films and New Line Cinema over the amount Jackson was paid for "The Fellowship of the Ring," including DVD payments.

While Jackson hasn't said how much he believes he was underpaid, The New York Times last year quoted his lawyers as saying it was as much as $100 million. He is suing New Line Cinema over the shortfall (emphasis mine).


:|
Andy on Lou's 300-inspired foray into Ancients:
"And remember Lou, Historicals people go nuts over historical accuracy. Therefore it's critically important you quote the movie with that accent as much as possible while playing every game."
User avatar
Jeramakus
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:54 pm
Location: Maplewood, NJ

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby VectorAWX3 » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:14 am

:( What ever happened to doing it for the art?
Jaghatai, on the Pale Rider event: I hop on this board to post a simple NEWCC question, end up looking at some interacial lesbian action and watch a religious meltdown. You guys know how to party!
User avatar
VectorAWX3
 
Posts: 10006
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:13 am

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby Emperors Reckoning » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:27 am

I'd say the five years out in the bloody cold of the NZ mountains handle the "for the art" part. Short-sighted of New Line, but not uncommon at the accountant and lawyer end of the business.
Emperors Reckoning
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:37 pm

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby -Jarrett » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:12 am

You think they'd do the math and pay him for the Jackson near-guarantee of the films success and quality. I guess they think it's a gaurantee anyway and if its a bad film, well, who cares
-Jarrett
 
Posts: 3773
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 1:35 pm

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby Gleeptoid7 » Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:23 am

At least this free's him up for the Meet the Feelbles sequel.
Gleeptoid7
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:11 pm

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby Ancow » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:04 pm

I'm holding out for Heavenly Creatures 2
User avatar
Ancow
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:23 pm

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby Emperors Reckoning » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:43 pm

Frighteners 2: Now the Creepy Stuff Starts
Emperors Reckoning
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:37 pm

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby Amazonwarlord » Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:55 pm

Son of Rat Monkey !!
"I have not failed, I've just found ten thousand ways that won't work." – Thomas Edison
User avatar
Amazonwarlord
 
Posts: 2677
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:40 pm

Re: No hobbit for you!

Postby -the black prince » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:14 pm

Quote:
I'm holding out for Heavenly Creatures 2


really? I couldn't quite see the point of it.

Shame about the hobbit: they talk about 2 films - the hobbit and a lotr 'prequel' - not the silmarilion?! :(
-the black prince
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 1:35 pm

Next

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron