And the FAQs are up

Moderator: Anger Worm

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby Larro » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:09 pm

Ronen Warrior wrote:Well Mr. GTKing, how would you structure an event? What ruleset do you recomend?


??

I think the NE Indys have it right. You're free to disagree, but I wasn't trying to say we change the Indys at all. I'd simply just do what we do now, sans Comp. It's the opinion of most people that you don't need Comp for 8th, so I figure it would be even more streamlined and easier to run. Pick a point level, do 5 or 6 games, and you have to keep BOTH Painting and Sports to both prevent huge dickheads while simultaneously continuing to encourage quality events with painted and assembled armies, and presto, you've got an 8th Edition tourney, just like 7th. Scenarios are up to TO as always.

If it's the general consensus that competitive Warhammer is totally done with, that's fine too. I just didn't know how it was shaking out. If guys like Jarrett and Andy are agreeing with Birdoff, then I'm certain there is merit to the idea that "competitive" Warhammer no longer exists.

- Larry
"Just being born means you've lost to Larro. Or haven't you gotten the memo yet?" - Nidal

"Larry was right. I know he never gets tired of hearing that." - Canterman
User avatar
Larro
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:52 pm

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby WickerNipple » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:17 pm

"Competitive" is a tricky word. You're playing "against" someone else, so obviously it's a competition in some fashion or another.

What I do think is that it's something you can't take remotely seriously anymore, or really approach winning as an objective or value. A lot of us did - and I think 8th will be deeply unsatisfying if we continue to do so. That's all.

Some people will think that makes the game and thus the events more inclusive. Some people will think it makes them pointless. As long as there's a party, I'm sure to attend anyway since that's all I've come for since I quit the last time around. I really don't know what the ideal 8th ed event will be, it's going to take some fucking around with until something proper settles into place.
User avatar
WickerNipple
 
Posts: 8135
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:37 am

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby Ancow » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:30 pm

Ronen Warrior wrote:
Larro wrote:I don't think it's a two way street; I'm not sure you can convince people who do care about winning to come to an event where winning = zero importance.


Well Mr. GTKing, how would you structure an event? What ruleset do you recomend?

Image
User avatar
Ancow
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:23 pm

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby mattbird » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:33 pm

I agree with the above. I would go just to have fun regardless, BUT--

I would not be excited about an 8th ed event where the TO tries to change the rules in any way to mitigate the craziness of it all, which is what I think some people might want to do. I also really don't see how the game is compable any more, so any event with comp would be a turnoff to me.

So, if it is 8th edition full on, no rules changes, no comp, I would still go.

Otherwise, no.
jer732 wrote:Birdoff makes me want to rage quit life
mattbird
 
Posts: 5595
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby WickerNipple » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:53 pm

mattbird wrote:I would not be excited about an 8th ed event where the TO tries to change the rules in any way to mitigate the craziness of it all, which is what I think some people might want to do.


Right, that is the result of what I was saying above - any attempts at making the thing more objective will wind up just looking arbitrary when compared with the entire framework. All in for the lulz or fuckit.
User avatar
WickerNipple
 
Posts: 8135
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:37 am

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby Pariah » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:34 am

Could you guys enumerate the reasons why you can't take 8th ed. seriously. People have mentioned scattered reasons here and there, but I'd love to see a full accounting of it all in one place. I think it's very telling about an edition of Warhammer if players from one of the premiere groups of players in the U.S. are rejecting it competitively.
Pariah
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:28 pm

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby xmbk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:18 am

I wonder if a GT could pull off a "best out of 3" format? 2k at most, maybe 1500. But you play 3 games in a row against the same opponent, so flukey wins get minimized. 3 close, hard fought games would have a problem with the time limit. But most of the time that probably won't happen. Maybe give players the choice to play round 1 Friday night, or start early on Saturday. Then round 3 can run late if necessary. Plenty of time on Sunday for 2 rounds.

Maybe. ;)
Not caring adds a whole new dimension to the game.
xmbk
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby elrodogg » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:54 am

Games going quicker means more rounds. That certainly takes a lot of the randomness out of the game.

Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
Fast, like kittens with jetpacks.
User avatar
elrodogg
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby VectorAWX3 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:56 am

Do you really want to play the same guy 3 times? Particularly when you figure out, after game one, that the guy is a douche and that his army is built in such a way as to grind your army into dust?

The idea of playhing more games to iron out statistical anomalies works just as well if you play 3 different guys. So your idea that you simply play more games does have merit in that sense. But as you said, the game sizes need to get smaller for the games to get shorter. Where do you draw the line? 10 X 1200 point games? 14 * 1000 point games?
Jaghatai, on the Pale Rider event: I hop on this board to post a simple NEWCC question, end up looking at some interacial lesbian action and watch a religious meltdown. You guys know how to party!
User avatar
VectorAWX3
 
Posts: 10006
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:13 am

Re: And the FAQs are up

Postby elrodogg » Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:07 am

2400 pt games won't take two hours once people have the rules down. A seven game tournament isn't out of the question time wise
Fast, like kittens with jetpacks.
User avatar
elrodogg
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Brooklyn

PreviousNext

Return to Warhammer Fantasy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests

cron