Sneaky Git comments here

Moderators: KevinC, mattbird

Sneaky Git comments here

Postby mattbird » Mon May 11, 2009 12:05 pm

Please post all comments here
jer732 wrote:Birdoff makes me want to rage quit life
mattbird
 
Posts: 5595
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby method » Mon May 11, 2009 11:51 pm

LOVE the sneaky gits rules, i think that the rules are perfect for them, and 3 poisened attacks each to your flank WILL make people notice them, like cheaper, BETTER witch elves.
A+++ on design
method
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:24 pm

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby mauleed » Tue May 12, 2009 9:01 am

I can't imagine ever taking sneaky gitz. The special slot is too valuable.

A suggestion for a rules change: instead of the extra attacks if they flank\rear you, how about they get one free reform (before charges) per game. Now that would be sneaky! (and might make them worth a special slot).
mauleed
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:23 pm

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby Sergrum » Tue May 12, 2009 2:30 pm

I think if you want to add variety to the list, and to make these guys a viable choice. Make them unit size 5-10 scouts/skirmishers. Also up their points to like 9. That way, they can get the most out of their flank/rear charge. 10 charging rear of skeles is 28 poison! Nasty! Also skirms/scouts actually goes with the sneakyness.
Sergrum
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:02 am

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby Poxous » Tue May 12, 2009 2:32 pm

Alex stole my idea! Skirmished core unit. These would be fun to play and would be effective. Also drop the animosity for them as they are trained kill teams that are used to working together. Just up the pts to 8 per model or so. I think it is a viable unit as a core troop. Make them not count as core for min purposes.
Poxous
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:59 am

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby Sergrum » Tue May 12, 2009 2:39 pm

Idk if i like core, only because i like the fact specials actually make you make a decision on what to include. and with swivel guns most likely moving to a detachment anything that keeps people from auto picking 4-6 of those cheap BTs is fine by me.
Sergrum
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:02 am

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby Poxous » Tue May 12, 2009 2:42 pm

Well BCs being special is big. Deathrockets don't seem so attractive to me. I could see people doing 1 BC, 1 OG, and 4 BTs a lot. The army needs a way to deal with big nasty stuff. Not sure how to go about it. Bolt thrower spam is not fun for sure.
Poxous
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:59 am

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby Punk » Tue May 12, 2009 4:20 pm

...It doesn't feel right for a special unit...

I agree that it feels like this unit will lose the battle of attention to the other special options...

Make em a core slot...not counting for core...scout-skirmish as said above and make em 0-1
User avatar
Punk
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:18 am

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby mauleed » Wed May 13, 2009 9:13 am

skirmishing would definitely make these a viable option.
mauleed
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:23 pm

Re: Sneaky Git comments here

Postby Border Reiver » Wed May 13, 2009 12:47 pm

I would like to see the "sneaky nature" of the gitz emphasised with the scouting and skirmishing rules.

This should result in an increase in their cost to around 7-8 points each (animosity and lack of missile weapons justify the lower cost than is normal for a scouting unit).

Additionally, at present the rules are missing the "Unit Size". I am presuming for the current version that they are 10+. If made into skirmishers they should be 5-10 - with no options for standard bearers.
Border Reiver
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 11:55 am

Next

Return to Special

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron